Test Page
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Testing...
http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/CompiledNamePrecedents/Compatible.html
Shauna of Carrick Point | 2004.05 | The given name Moira (which may be viewed as either Scots or Anglicized Irish) has been ruled SCA compatible. [Moira O'Connor, 05/04, A-West] |
Elsbeth Anne Roth | 1999.09 | Moira is SCA compatible. [Moira MacGregor, 09/99, A-Outlands] |
Jaelle of Armida | 1998.01 | [Moira of the Meadows] Moyra is an undocumented variant spelling of the Anglicized spelling of the Gaelic equivalent of Mary. Since the Gaelic form of Mary was a rare usage during our period, we do not feel that the Anglicized form was used enough to form variant spellings. (Jaelle of Armida, LoAR January 1998, p. 4) |
Jaelle of Armida | 1997.06 | [Moira MacVey] No evidence has been presented that Moira is a period name. However, given its usage in the SCA we are ruling it SCA compatible. (Jaelle of Armida, LoAR June 1997, p. 7) |
Jaelle of Armida | 1997.04 | No evidence has been presented that Moira is a period name. However, given its usage in the SCA we are ruling it SCA compatible. (Moira MacVey, 6/97 p. 7) |
SENA Appendix A: Patterns That Do Not Need Further Documentation...
http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/sena.html#AppendixA
Mongol:
Mongol names are quite different in structure from European names. All patterns documented in Baras-aghur Naran, "On the Documentation and Construction of Period Mongolian Names" (http://www.s-gabriel.org/names/baras-aghur/mongolian.html) are registerable.
SENA Appendix C: Regional Naming Groups and Their Mixes
http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/sena.html#AppendixC
Regional Groups: | By Time Period: | Languages Included In This Group: | Can Be Combined With Groups: |
Mongol | 550-1100 | n/a | n/a |
1100-1600 | Mongol, etc. | Arabic
Hungarian/Romanian Persian Russian/East Slavic Turkish |
http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/CompiledNamePrecedents/Compatible.html
Alisoun MacCoul of Elphane | 1986.12.28 | The name Moriah has been returned previously ... on the grounds that it is a Biblical place name, the mountain where Abraham prepared to sacrifice Isaac, and not a form used in period as a given name. No evidence has been presented to contravene that precedent. (LoAR 28 Dec 86, p. 17) |