Test Page: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 18:44, 4 August 2018

Testing stuff...

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Testing stuff...
-http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/CompiledNamePrecedents/Compatible.html
-{| class="wikitable"
-| colspan="3" |'''Lilith'''
-|-
-|Jaelle of Armida
-|1998.02
-|[Lleulyth o'r Cymry verch Llewfron mab Dafydd] While the submitter says that Welsh adopted names from the bible, and that ''Lleulyth'' is Welsh version of ''Lilith''. However ''Lilith'' is not a Biblical name -- she appears in non-canonical Jewish folklore, but not the version of the texts generally available in Europe during the medieval period. Nor does she fall in the class of figures whose names were borrowed for use. It is possible that somewhere in a period Welsh text, there is a reference to Lilith, however it does not occur in any of the texts cited by the submitter. No one in the college has any documentation for ''Lleulyth'' as a period Welsh name (whether connected with Lilith or not), nor can it be justified on the basis of existing compound name elements. And, the submitter did not provide any documentation for it, outside of her assertion. (Jaelle of Armida, LoAR February 1998, p. 21)
-|}
-http://heraldry.sca.org/laurel/precedents/CompiledNamePrecedents/Compatible.html
-{| class="wikitable"
-| colspan="3" |'''Lindsay'''
-|-
-|Elsbeth Anne Roth
-|1999.10
-|We were given no evidence that ''Lindsay'' was a given name in period. ['''Lindsay MacBean''', [http://sca.org/heraldry/loar/1999/10/lar.html 10/99], R-Calontir]
-|}