Editing Laurel Discussion at Toys for Tots 2023

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 8: Line 8:
1. I think that the somewhat risky decision to run the meeting in the format of an open discussion – “just speak up” rather than waiting to be recognized – worked amazingly well. It speaks well for the self-control and consideration for others of the participants that we made that work. I think we will attempt to use the same system at Kris Kinder.
1. I think that the somewhat risky decision to run the meeting in the format of an open discussion – “just speak up” rather than waiting to be recognized – worked amazingly well. It speaks well for the self-control and consideration for others of the participants that we made that work. I think we will attempt to use the same system at Kris Kinder.


2. An unexpected (for me, at least) thing that came out in this discussion is the almost total lack of understanding between the Laurels and the non-Laurels about what the Laurels are looking for in a candidate. I was really surprised at this. I think the discussion on this topic at TFT was extremely valuable, but what is even better is that several laurels have been inspired to write and post (sometimes lengthy) descriptions of their philosophy on this to the FB group. While virtually all Laurels will quibble about minor points and value different things differently, if you model yourself on any of these several descriptions, you will make yourself a candidate that the order as a whole is likely to support. I want to encourage everyone to read and think about their words. In particular (and there may be others I have missed), Mistress Elanor, Mistress Aiden, Mistress Vashti, Mistress Fionnuala, Lady Selene, Master Hugo, Master Halvgrimr, and Mistress Alvira (OP) [and Master Mellitus] all wrote very valuable things. It is more than worth matching the time they took to compose these essays with your time reading them. Mistress Maria has helped me to compile them all (and if I have missed someone, please let Maria or me know). I am not yet sure what to do with this compiled document, but we are working on it.
2. An unexpected (for me, at least) thing that came out in this discussion is the almost total lack of understanding between the Laurels and the non-Laurels about what the Laurels are looking for in a candidate. I was really surprised at this. I think the discussion on this topic at TFT was extremely valuable, but what is even better is that several laurels have been inspired to write and post (sometimes lengthy) descriptions of their philosophy on this to the FB group. While virtually all Laurels will quibble about minor points and value different things differently, if you model yourself on any of these several descriptions, you will make yourself a candidate that the order as a whole is likely to support. I want to encourage everyone to read and think about their words. In particular (and there may be others I have missed), Mistress Elanor, Mistress Aiden, Mistress Vashti, Mistress Fionnuala, Lady Selene, Master Hugo, Master Halvgrimr, and Mistress Alvira (OP) all wrote very valuable things. It is more than worth matching the time they took to compose these essays with your time reading them. Mistress Maria has helped me to compile them all (and if I have missed someone, please let Maria or me know). I am not yet sure what to do with this compiled document, but we are working on it.


3. I went into the TFT meeting thinking about a sort of disconnect between what we expect from GoA-level artisans versus what we expect from Peer-level artisans. We didn’t get around to discussing that much, so I hope that we can talk about that at KK. I realized at the TFT meeting that we have two other disconnects that are worth talking about. First is this amazing lack of understanding regarding what the Laurels expect (discussed above). Second is a divide within the order of the Laurel (at least within this kingdom). I used to jokingly refer to a sub-group of the order as the “stick jock laurels” since most of them were fighters. In addition to the obvious similarities, this group used to stand out as having by far the highest standards for candidates. This is a little less true than it was, as age and retirement have changed the makeup of the Order a lot. I now think that what I was seeing back then, was not a division between fighter Laurels and non-fighter Laurels, but instead a division between Laurels who are deeply rooted in the “Arts and Sciences community” and those who aren’t. It may seem at first that there could not be a group of Laurels NOT deeply embedded in the A&S community, but it is true. For example, I have entered (and did badly in) exactly one A&S competition in 36 years. I have taught a couple of RUSH classes, but I was already a Laurel then. On the other hand, I have made a LOT of things, and I have taught a LOT of people a lot of things. I am far from alone in this trajectory, we have many Laurels who fit into this category. I think it is worth talking about these two different groups within the Order. I think this division is at the root of the confusion about what the Laurels want. If you talk to me about how to be a Laurel, I will tell you very different things than will an ‘A&S community Laurel’ and vice versa. This came out a little in the TFT meeting, as I think it was at the root of the (minor) disagreements among Laurels in attendance about what we expect. AND TO BE COMPLETELY CLEAR, I AM IN NO WAY SAYING THAT EITHER OF THESE GROUPS IS ‘RIGHT’ OR ‘BETTER’
3. I went into the TFT meeting thinking about a sort of disconnect between what we expect from GoA-level artisans versus what we expect from Peer-level artisans. We didn’t get around to discussing that much, so I hope that we can talk about that at KK. I realized at the TFT meeting that we have two other disconnects that are worth talking about. First is this amazing lack of understanding regarding what the Laurels expect (discussed above). Second is a divide within the order of the Laurel (at least within this kingdom). I used to jokingly refer to a sub-group of the order as the “stick jock laurels” since most of them were fighters. In addition to the obvious similarities, this group used to stand out as having by far the highest standards for candidates. This is a little less true than it was, as age and retirement have changed the makeup of the Order a lot. I now think that what I was seeing back then, was not a division between fighter Laurels and non-fighter Laurels, but instead a division between Laurels who are deeply rooted in the “Arts and Sciences community” and those who aren’t. It may seem at first that there could not be a group of Laurels NOT deeply embedded in the A&S community, but it is true. For example, I have entered (and did badly in) exactly one A&S competition in 36 years. I have taught a couple of RUSH classes, but I was already a Laurel then. On the other hand, I have made a LOT of things, and I have taught a LOT of people a lot of things. I am far from alone in this trajectory, we have many Laurels who fit into this category. I think it is worth talking about these two different groups within the Order. I think this division is at the root of the confusion about what the Laurels want. If you talk to me about how to be a Laurel, I will tell you very different things than will an ‘A&S community Laurel’ and vice versa. This came out a little in the TFT meeting, as I think it was at the root of the (minor) disagreements among Laurels in attendance about what we expect. AND TO BE COMPLETELY CLEAR, I AM IN NO WAY SAYING THAT EITHER OF THESE GROUPS IS ‘RIGHT’ OR ‘BETTER’
Please note that all contributions to Calontiri Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Calontiri Wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)