Category:Arts and Sciences: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
[https://www.calontir.org/arts-sciences/ Arts & Sciences Kingdom Website] | [https://www.calontir.org/arts-sciences/ Arts & Sciences Kingdom Website] | ||
[https://calontir.org/arts-sciences-faqs/ Arts & Sciences FAQs] | [https://calontir.org/arts-sciences-faqs/ Arts & Sciences FAQs] - defunct | ||
[https:// | [https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1S1XGMFpnd5oHdUr--PR0uWwjzcZoWjwm Kingdom Judging Criteria] - a Google folder | ||
Calontir tends to use a face-to-face judging system. This system is used for Kingdom-level Arts and Sciences events. Face-to-face judging is just that; there are no anonymous judges. The entrant sits down with the judges and the project and | Calontir tends to use a face-to-face judging system. This system is used for Kingdom-level Arts and Sciences events. Face-to-face judging is just that; there are no anonymous judges. The entrant sits down with the judges and the project and they discuss it together. There are usually three judges who are recognized as competent in the entry’s category who work in consensus to award points (if using criteria) or give general feedback. This allows the entrant to answer questions the judges may have or elaborate on some point that may not be in the documentation. It also allows for the judges to temper each other and the entrant knows immediately how the project fared. And it gives the entrant time to approach an authority such as the event steward or judge steward if they feel they were judged unfairly. | ||
[[Category:Activities]] | [[Category:Activities]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:33, 6 July 2024
Arts are...
Sciences are...
Arts & Sciences Kingdom Website
Arts & Sciences FAQs - defunct
Kingdom Judging Criteria - a Google folder
Calontir tends to use a face-to-face judging system. This system is used for Kingdom-level Arts and Sciences events. Face-to-face judging is just that; there are no anonymous judges. The entrant sits down with the judges and the project and they discuss it together. There are usually three judges who are recognized as competent in the entry’s category who work in consensus to award points (if using criteria) or give general feedback. This allows the entrant to answer questions the judges may have or elaborate on some point that may not be in the documentation. It also allows for the judges to temper each other and the entrant knows immediately how the project fared. And it gives the entrant time to approach an authority such as the event steward or judge steward if they feel they were judged unfairly.
Subcategories
This category has the following 61 subcategories, out of 61 total.
C
Pages in category "Arts and Sciences"
The following 14 pages are in this category, out of 14 total.